Dan Gilbert Stumbling on Happiness

Memory is part illusion part fact and fallible

© Jerry Lopper

Sep 6, 2006
Our memories of past experiences are part illusion. The brain isn't large enough to record everything we experience so it fills in the gaps with imagination.

Daniel Gilbert's entertaining and enlightening book, Stumbling on Happiness, describes how memory works; a description that should humble anyone harboring the illusion of a great memory. Our brain's capacity is huge, but not nearly large enough to store every sight, sound, smell, touch, taste, and emotion we experience. It turns out we make up much of what we think we remember.

Have you ever argued passionately with someone about your recollection of a past situation that you both experienced? If you're like most of us the answer is yes, and the resulting argument might never have been settled because you both may have been simultaneously right and wrong.

Because the brain can't store every detail, it makes up for this limitation by storing just enough to recall a past experience. This generally is sufficient for our needs, but does lead to eye-witness fallibility and lots of personal arguments over past experiences.

Gilbert explains it this way. We compress the huge amount of data that we perceive in a given experience into a few critical components: the sensory highlights and associated emotions. Later, as we recall the event, our mind brings up the highlights and emotions and fills in the rest. That's right, we imagine what would have occurred to smooth out the few pieces of fact and form a complete story.

This is all very interesting, but what value is this information beyond water-cooler talk? How about fewer arguments? Wouldn't that contribute to a more tranquil life? How about better decisions? Isn't that important to your personal growth?

  • The next time you are set to dig into your version of a past event in a heated discussion (or bet) with another person, remind yourself your memory is only a partial recording of what occurred. You both may be right.
  • Be tolerant of memory lapses of other people. You have them too.
  • Don't depend on another person's memory of an event or experience. It's close but not an exact replica of what occurred.
  • Remind yourself that your memory isn't an exact replica either.
  • Decisions are often easier if we base them on past experiences. Now you know that your recollection of past experience may be faulty or incomplete. Keep that in mind with major decisions.
  • It's fine to ask advice of other people, but recognize that if the advice comes from past experiences it is partly fiction.

In the future, if recollection of a past event is important to you because of a disagreement, to make a decision, or to learn from it, consider the emotion that accompanied the past event. The emotion at the time will provide clues about the role that imagination played in recalling the past event. And remember that the past is past, our memories are fallible, and part of what we each remember is illusion.


The copyright of the article Dan Gilbert Stumbling on Happiness in Personal Development is owned by Jerry Lopper. Permission to republish Dan Gilbert Stumbling on Happiness in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Sep 6, 2006 3:31 AM
Jerry Lopper :
Are you surprised by Gilbert's description of how we remember? Does it fit your experience?
Sep 6, 2006 12:59 PM
Robert Dailey :
Jerry:
I couldn't agree more. Could it also be that we embellish memories to create a more favorable outcome or solution different from what actually happened?
Thanks for the gfreat article.
Sep 7, 2006 1:58 AM
Jerry Lopper :
Yes, that's certainly possible. Gilbert explains that we often "cook the facts" to maintain or move toward greater happiness. A negative situation is often rationalized as it wasn't so bad after all, or that was the best thing that could have happened to me, etc.
3 Comments